Re: One big database or little separate ones? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Allan Berger
Subject Re: One big database or little separate ones?
Date
Msg-id a05200fa4bc2749159499@[128.255.89.219]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One big database or little separate ones?  (Eric Frazier <ef@kwinternet.com>)
Responses Re: One big database or little separate ones?  (Andreas <maps.on@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-novice
Hi all,

This is a great topic for me, as I'm just now starting to consider
this very issue.

Is there any advantage to maintaining separate databases for backup purposes?

Specifically, I am going to have a large number of tables with text
info, and just a few tables that saves several gigabytes of images
and data files.  I was thinking of having the text data in one
database to allow for frequent backups (every few hours), with the
large image and file database backed up less frequently (once a day
or less frequently).

Is the balance in backing up several hundred megs of text data
frequently v. several gigabytes of less critical binary data a good
reason to maintain separate databases?  All thoughts welcome...

-Allan


At 3:11 PM -0800 1/10/04, Eric Frazier wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The only reason to separate databases, is if the data has no relation
>from one DB to another. Otherwise, you are just making things hard on
>yourself.
>
>Eric


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: small.witch@gmx.de
Date:
Subject: Alter TABLE with Postgres 7.2
Next
From: "Dario Ottaviano"
Date:
Subject: Case sensitivity